ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Adversarial Defense via Brain Activity Integration Without Adversarial Examples.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adversarial attacks on large-scale vision-language foundation models, such as the contrastive language-image pretraining (CLIP) model, can significantly degrade performance across various tasks by generating adversarial examples that are indistinguishable from the original images to human perception. Although adversarial training methods, which train models with adversarial examples, have been proposed to defend against such attacks, they typically require prior knowledge of the attack. These methods also lead to a trade-off between robustness to adversarial examples and accuracy for clean images. To address these challenges, we propose an adversarial defense method based on human brain activity data by hypothesizing that such adversarial examples are not misrecognized by humans. The proposed method employs an encoder that integrates the features of brain activity and augmented images from the original images. Then, by maximizing the similarity between features predicted by the encoder and the original visual features, we obtain features with the visual invariance of the human brain and the diversity of data augmentation. Consequently, we construct a model that is robust against adversarial attacks and maintains accuracy for clean images. Unlike existing methods, the proposed method is not trained on any specific adversarial attack information; thus, it is robust against unknown attacks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method significantly enhances robustness to adversarial attacks on the CLIP model without degrading accuracy for clean images. The primary contribution of this study is that the performance trade-off can be overcome using brain activity data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.