ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on Enhanced Dynamic Pig Counting Based on YOLOv8n and Deep SORT.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pig Passage Counting Based on Improved YOLO and HMTC Strategy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Underwater Multi-Target Tracking and Behavioral Rhythm Analysis of Chinese Giant Salamander Based on TransTrack-OC-SORT.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pig counting is an essential activity in the administration of pig farming. Currently, manual counting is inefficient, costly, and unsuitable for systematic analysis. However, research on dynamic pig counting encounters challenges, including inadequate detection accuracy stemming from crowding, occlusion, deformation, and low-light conditions. Target tracking issues characterized by poor accuracy, frequent identity confusion, and false positive trajectories ultimately lead to diminished accuracy in the final counting outcomes. Given these existing limitations, this paper proposes an enhanced algorithm based on the YOLOv8n+Deep SORT model. The ELA attention mechanism, GSConv, and VoVGSCSP lightweight convolution modules are introduced in YOLOv8n, which improve detection accuracy and speed for pig target recognition. Additionally, Deep SORT is enhanced by integrating the DenseNet feature extraction network and CIoU matching algorithm, improving the accuracy and stability of target tracking. Experimental results indicate that the improved Deep SORT-P pig tracking algorithm attains MOTA and MOTP values of 89.2% and 90.4%, respectively, reflecting improvements of 4.2% and 1.7%, while IDSW is diminished by 25.5%. Finally, counting experiments were performed on videos of pigs traversing the farm passage using both the original and improved algorithms. The improved YOLOv8n-EGV+Deep SORT-P algorithm achieved a counting accuracy of 92.1%, reflecting a 17.5% improvement over the original algorithm. Meanwhile, the improved algorithm presented in this study successfully attained stable dynamic pig counting in practical environments, offering valuable data and references for research on dynamic pig counting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.