ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Effects of Decreasing Foot Strike Angle on Lower Extremity Shock Attenuation Measured with Wearable Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shock attenuation may be a clinically feasible method to assess changes in lower extremity joint loading induced by gait modifications, such as decreasing foot strike angle (forefoot striking). The purpose of this study was to identify changes in lower extremity shock attenuation between habitual and forefoot strike gait conditions. Eighteen participants ran on a treadmill with their habitual gait and an instructed forefoot strike gait. Shock attenuation was measured with inertial measurement units as the ratio of proximal to distal peak resultant/vertical accelerations, with three sensor combinations: ankle to below/above knee (BK/A; AK/A) and AK/BK. Three participants were excluded who were habitual forefoot strikers or failed to decrease their foot strike angle by at least 5° in the forefoot strike condition. The results showed significantly greater resultant shock attenuation in the forefoot strike compared to the habitual condition for BK/A (mean Δ = 0.13,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.