ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Validation of Smartphones in Arbitrary Positions Against Force Plate Standard for Balance Assessment.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Addiction and Body Balance: An Investigation of Postural Stability in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
- Dynamic Gait Stability Estimated Using One or Two Inertial Measurement Units Worn on the Human Body.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Balance assessment is a key metric for tracking the health and fall risk of individuals with balance impairment. Leveraging wearable sensors and mobile devices can increase clinical accessibility to objective balance metrics. Previous work has been conducted validating center of mass (COM) acceleration metrics from mobile devices against the gold standard force plate center of pressure (COP) position; however, most studies have been restricted to devices being placed close to the subject's COM. In this study, rigid body kinematics and the inverted pendulum model were used to develop a novel methodology for calculating COM acceleration using mobile devices in arbitrary positions, as well as an approach for conversion of COM measurements to COP position for direct validation with force plate measurements. Validation of this methodology included a direct comparison of smartphone and force plate results for COM accelerations and COP positions, as well as statistical comparisons using Spearman's rank correlation. The results show strong analysis performance for both approaches during a subject's intentional swaying, with more limited results in cases of little motion. The strong performance warrants future work to further improve accessibility by removing dependence on motion capture systems or replacing them with cost-effective alternatives. The accurate tracking of COM acceleration and COP position information for mobile devices at arbitrary positions increases the flexibility for future mobile or at-home balance assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.