ArticlePolymers2025
Analyzing the Potential of Laser Femtosecond Technology for the Mass Production of Cyclic Olefin Copolymer Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision micromilling is currently widely used for the fabrication of injection mold inserts for the mass production of microfluidic devices. However, for complex devices with micrometer-scale and high density of structures, micromilling results in high production times and costs for production runs of hundreds or thousands of units. Femtosecond laser (fs-laser) technology has emerged as a promising solution for high-precision micromachining. This study analyzes the potential of fs-laser micromachining for the fabrication of injection mold inserts for the large-scale production of thermoplastic microfluidic devices. For the evaluation of technology, a reference design was defined. The parameters of the fs-laser process were optimized to achieve high resolution of the structures and optimal surface quality, aiming to minimize production times and costs while ensuring the quality of the final part. The microstructures were replicated in two different grades of COC (Cyclic Olefin Copolymer) by injection molding. The dimensional tolerance of the structures and the surface finish achieved both in the insert and the polymer parts were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy. The surface quality of the final parts and its suitability for microfluidic fabrication were also assessed performing chemical bonding tests. The fs-laser machining process has shown great potential for the mass production of microfluidic devices. The developed process has enabled for a reduction of up to 90% in the fabrication times of the insert compared to micromilling. The parts exhibited very smooth surfaces, with roughness values (Sa) of 64.6 nm for the metallic insert and 71.8 nm and 72.9 nm for the COC E-140 and 8007S-04 replicas, respectively. The dimensional tolerance and the surface quality need to be improved to be competitive with the finishes achieved with precision micromilling. Nonetheless, there is still room for improvement considering the significant reduction in the production times through new laser processing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.