ReviewPolymers2025
Nondestructive Testing of Externally Bonded FRP Concrete Structures: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of Anchored and Unanchored EB-FRP Systems for Tension Strengthening of Concrete Structures.Polymers · 2026Review
- A New Multi-Modal Data Fusion Framework for Delamination Detection in Concrete Bridge Decks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Infrared Thermography for Defect Detectability in Structural Health Monitoring of Concrete Structures: Heat Transfer Physics, Resolution Limits, and AI-Assisted Diagnostics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Detection and Location of Defects in Externally Bonded FRP Concrete Structures-Comparison of Selected Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminates in Aviation and Structural Engineering: A Synthetic Comparison of Performance Requirements, Design Principles, and Defect Assessment Procedures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing application of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites in rehabilitating deteriorating concrete infrastructure underscores the need for reliable, cost-effective, and automated nondestructive testing (NDT) methods. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of existing and emerging NDT techniques used to assess externally bonded FRP (EB-FRP) systems, emphasizing their accuracy, limitations, and practicality. Various NDT methods, including Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR), Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT), Infrared Thermography (IRT), Acoustic Emission (AE), and Impact-Echo (IE), are critically evaluated in terms of their effectiveness in detecting debonding, voids, delaminations, and other defects. Recent technological advancements, particularly the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in NDT applications, have significantly improved defect characterization, automated inspections, and real-time data analysis. This review highlights AI-driven NDT approaches such as automated crack detection, hybrid NDT frameworks, and drone-assisted thermographic inspections, which enhance accuracy and efficiency in large-scale infrastructure assessments. Additionally, economic considerations and cost-performance trade-offs are analyzed, addressing the feasibility of different NDT methods in real-world FRP-strengthened structures. Finally, the review identifies key research gaps, including the need for standardization in FRP-NDT applications, AI-enhanced defect quantification, and hybrid inspection techniques. By consolidating state-of-the-art research and emerging innovations, this paper serves as a valuable resource for engineers, researchers, and practitioners involved in the assessment, monitoring, and maintenance of FRP-strengthened concrete structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.