ArticlePolymers2025
Post-Curing Effects on the Tensile Properties of Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Polymers: Experimental and Numerical Insights.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fiber-Matrix Interface Engineering in Polymer Composites: Linking Surface Chemistry to Multiscale Mechanical Performance.Polymers · 2026Review
- Effects of Fiber Orientation, Thermal Post-Curing, and Corrosive Environment on the Mechanical Properties of CFRP Laminates.Polymers · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Hybrid Polymeric Woven Composites: Mechanical Performance, Numerical Simulation, and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Experimental evaluation of sustainable jute-basalt hybrid FRP systems for flexural strengthening of RC beams with variable wrapping and light-weight aggregate replacement.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of post-curing temperatures on the tensile properties of hybrid basalt-jute-glass-carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). Composite specimens were post-cured at 60 °C and 100 °C for 60 min, and their tensile behavior was assessed using a servo-hydraulic testing machine. Numerical simulations using the Abaqus software V6.14 were also conducted to compare experimental and computational results. The findings indicate that post-curing heat treatment enhances ductility due to increased polymer cross-linking, but excessive heat treatment at 100 °C negatively impacts elongation at fracture. The results revealed that specimens post-cured at 60 °C exhibited the optimal balance between strength and ductility, with increased elongation and moderate tensile strength. However, at 100 °C, while tensile strength improved in some cases, a significant decrease in elasticity and an increased risk of brittleness were observed, suggesting that extreme heat treatment may degrade polymer integrity. Natural fiber composites, particularly jute-based samples, outperformed synthetic composites in terms of elongation and overall mechanical stability. The numerical simulations provided further insights but showed discrepancies with experimental results, mainly due to fiber property variations and fabric waviness, underscoring the challenges of accurately modeling woven composites. The study highlights the importance of controlled post-curing temperatures in optimizing the mechanical performance of FRP composites, with 60 °C identified as the most effective condition for achieving a favorable balance between tensile strength, flexibility, and material durability. These findings offer valuable insights for material scientists and engineers working on the development of high-performance composite materials for structural and industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.