ArticlePolymers2025
Agar Biopolymer as a Sustainable Alternative Binder to Enhance the Strength of Low-Plasticity Soil.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-plasticity silts (ML) found in Metro Manila, Philippines, characterized by low strength, stiffness, and bearing capacity, often require stabilization. Traditional methods using cement are associated with significant carbon emissions, causing environmental concerns. Sustainable materials such as agar biopolymers can be an alternative to cement to improve the strength of fine-grained soils. A comparative study was conducted on ML samples treated with agar and cement at different concentrations (1%, 3%, 5%, and 7%) and subjected to varying curing periods (7, 21, 28, and 35 days) under air-dried conditions using Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) tests. Agar-treated samples generally exhibited higher UCS values than cement-treated samples across the tested concentrations and curing periods. Samples with 3% and 5% agar were significantly stronger than their cement-treated counterparts. The strength of agar-treated soils peaked at a 5% concentration and subsequently decreased at 7% agar, possibly due to a masking effect. SEM-EDS analysis revealed that a 5% agar concentration achieved a balanced microstructure with effective particle bonding, while higher concentrations led to diminished strength due to reduced mechanical interlocking from excessive biopolymer coverage. Subsequent statistical analysis also indicated significant improvement using agar versus cement-treated and untreated soils, especially at 5% agar. A predictive polynomial regression model demonstrated the influence of curing days and agar concentration on UCS, attaining R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.