ArticlePolymers2025
Impact and Failure Analysis of U-Shaped Concrete Containing Polyurethane Materials: Deep Learning and Digital Imaging Correlation-Based Approach.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Output Prediction and Optimization of COPolymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the use of advanced convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to analyze and classify the fracture behavior of U-shaped concrete modified with polyurethane (PU) under repeated drop-weight impact loads. A total of 17 U-shaped specimens were tested under multiple drop-weight impact loads for each PU binder content (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by weight of cement. By integrating digital image correlation (DIC) with dynamic and static mechanical testing, this research evaluates the concrete's impact resistance and flexural behavior with varying PU binder content. Three CNN architectures, InceptionV3, MobileNet, and DenseNet121, were trained on a dataset comprising 1655 high-resolution crack images to classify the failure stages into no crack, initial crack, and advanced failure. Experimental results revealed that 20% PU content optimally enhances impact resistance and flexural strength, while mechanical properties declined significantly with 30% PU content. The strain localization in DIC analysis indicated reduced matrix cohesion, which was measured by the extent of strain concentration in the material, highlighting the importance of maintaining PU content below 20% to avoid compromising structural integrity. Among the models, InceptionV3 demonstrated superior accuracy (96.67%), precision, and recall, outperforming MobileNet (94.56%) and DenseNet121 (90.03%). The combination of DIC and deep learning offers a robust, automated framework for crack assessment, significantly improving accuracy and efficiency over traditional methods such as visual inspections, which are time-consuming and reliant on expert judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.