ArticlePolymers2025
Clinical Performance of Zirconia Veneers Bonded with MDP-Containing Polymeric Adhesives: A One-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale Design of Dental Restorative Materials: Mechanistic Foundations, Technological Innovations, and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Two-Year Clinical Performance of Ultra-Thin No-Prep Veneers from 5Y-TZP Zirconia: A Retrospective Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acid-etched zirconia has emerged as a high-strength alternative to traditional glass ceramics for laminate veneers in aesthetic dentistry. This randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the one-year clinical performance of zirconia veneers etched with a hydrofluoric-nitric acid mixture and bonded using a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) containing polymeric adhesive system, compared to lithium disilicate veneers. Fifty-two patients were treated with either translucent zirconia or lithium disilicate veneers, and restorations were bonded using light-cured resin-based adhesives. Clinical parameters, including veneer survival, esthetics, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, and periodontal health, were assessed using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria and periodontal indexes at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Both materials showed high survival rates with no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes. One zirconia veneer debonded early but was successfully rebonded without fracture, while one lithium disilicate veneer fractured upon debonding. The findings support the viability of acid-etched zirconia veneers bonded with polymer-based adhesives as a durable and esthetic restorative option. The study highlights the clinical relevance of polymeric bonding systems in enhancing zirconia veneer performance and reinforces their role in modern adhesive dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.