ArticlePolymers2025
Design of Flexible TPU-Based Lattice Structures for 3D Printing: A Comparative Analysis of Open-Cell Versus Closed-Cell Topologies.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of the influence of open-cell and closed-cell topologies on the manufacturing quality and resultant elasticity of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) lattice structures. Lattice samples were designed based on various open-cell and closed-cell configurations, varying in unit cell size and fabricated using extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) techniques. A microscopic analysis was conducted to assess manufacturing defects, while mechanical compression tests were performed to characterize the elasticity of the samples. The correlation between the obtained results enabled the evaluation of the relationship between the manufacturability of lattice topologies and their stiffness. The findings reveal substantial differences in the manufacturability of the topologies, with open-cell structures exhibiting more pronounced defects. Additionally, the unit cell size and the resulting density of the samples were found to provide design advantages, as closed-cell topologies demonstrated superior load resistance. The accumulation of manufacturing defects was identified as a critical factor influencing deviations in stiffness measurements. This study establishes a foundational framework for lattice structural design, emphasizing the impact of cell topology and unit cell size on mechanical performance. The significance of this research lies in its contribution to the optimization of 3D printed TPU-based lattice structures, providing valuable insights for product design applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.