ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Antibacterial Activity of the p53 Tumor Suppressor Protein-How Strong Is the Evidence?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- NiCo₂O₄ nanoparticles as chemosensitizers: enhancing doxorubicin-ınduced ıntrinsic apoptosis in A549 and MCF-7 cells.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cutaneous Tuberculosis in the Modern Era: A Case of Lupus Vulgaris with Surgical Management and a Review of Clinical Spectrum, Diagnostic Challenges, and Malignant Potential.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The p53 tumor suppressor is best known for controlling the cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair, and metabolism, but it also regulates immunity and is able to impede the live cycle of viruses. For this reason, these infectious agents encode proteins which inactivate p53. However, what is less known is that p53 can also be inactivated by human pathogenic bacteria. It is probably not due to collateral damage, but specific targeting, because p53 could interfere with their multiplication. The mechanisms of the antibacterial activity of p53 are poorly known. However, they can be inferred from the results of high-throughput studies, which have identified more than a thousand p53-activated genes. As it turns out, many of these genes code proteins which have proven or plausible antibacterial functions like the efficient detection of bacteria by pattern recognition receptors, the induction of pro-inflammatory pyroptosis, the recruitment of immune cells, direct bactericidal activity, and the presentation of bacterial metabolites to lymphocytes. Probably there are more antibacterial, p53-regulated functions which were overlooked because laboratory animals are kept in sterile conditions. In this review, we present the outlines of some intriguing antibacterial mechanisms of p53 which await further exploration. Definitely, this area of research deserves more attention, especially in light of the appearance of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.