ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Body Fluid-Derived Stem Cells: Powering Innovative, Less-Invasive Cell Therapies.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telomerase-active urine-derived stem cells: Regenerative solutions for aging.Ageing research reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stem cell therapy offers significant promise for tissue regeneration and repair. Traditionally, bone marrow- and adipose-derived stem cells have served as primary sources, but their clinical use is limited by invasiveness and low cell yield. This review focuses on body fluid-derived stem cells as an emerging, non-invasive, and readily accessible alternative. We examine stem cells isolated from amniotic fluid, peripheral blood, cord blood, menstrual fluid, urine, synovial fluid, breast milk, and cerebrospinal fluid, highlighting their unique biological properties and therapeutic potential. By comparing their characteristics and barriers to clinical translation, we propose body fluid-derived stem cells as a promising source for regenerative applications, with continued research needed to fully achieve their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.