ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Evaluating the Inflammatory Protein Ratio (IPR) as an Inflammation-Based Biomarker for Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic inflammation is increasingly recognized as a key driver of tumorigenesis, affecting both the tumor microenvironment and host response. In this context, circulating inflammatory proteins may provide valuable insights into cancer activity. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the inflammatory protein ratio (IPR), a composite index derived from serum protein electrophoresis, in detecting active cancer among hospitalized patients. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data from 312 adult patients admitted to the Internal Medicine and Aging Department at Policlinico Foggia, Italy, between November 2023 and July 2024. Patients were stratified according to the presence of active cancer, defined by NICE criteria. The diagnostic accuracy of the IPR was compared with that of conventional inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The IPR showed the highest diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 88.1%, a specificity of 75.2%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.868. Its negative predictive value reached 97.6%, underscoring its potential as a rule-out tool for malignancy in hospitalized patients. These findings support the IPR as a promising and cost-effective inflammation-based biomarker for cancer detection, warranting further validation in prospective and molecularly characterized cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.