Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40362543›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Integration of Bioinformatics and Machine Learning Strategies Identifies Ferroptosis and Immune Infiltration Signatures in Peri-Implantitis.

Jieying Huang, Yaokun Zou, Huizhi Deng, Jun Zha, Janak Lal Pathak, Yaxin Chen, Qing Ge, Liping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jieying HuangDepartment of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China.
Yaokun ZouDepartment of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China.
Huizhi DengDepartment of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China.
Jun ZhaDepartment of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China.
Janak Lal PathakDepartment of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China.
Yaxin ChenDepartment of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China.
Qing GeDepartment of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China.
Liping WangDepartment of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3750-8946

Funding

China Oral Health Foundation COHF ZZZX202403GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515110988Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2024A04J3471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peri-implantitis (PI) is a chronic inflammatory disease that ultimately leads to the dysfunction and loss of implants with established osseointegration. Ferroptosis has been implicated in the progression of PI, but its precise mechanisms remain unclear. This study explores the molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis in the pathology of PI through bioinformatics, offering new insights into its diagnosis and treatment. The microarray datasets for PI (GSE33774 and GSE106090) were retrieved from the GEO database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) were intersected to obtain PI-Ferr-DEGs. Using three machine learning algorithms, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE), and Boruta, we successfully identified the most crucial biomarkers. Additionally, these key biomarkers were validated using a verification dataset (GSE223924). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was also utilized to analyze the associated gene enrichment pathways. Moreover, immune cell infiltration analysis compared the differential immune cell profiles between PI and control samples. Also, we targeted biomarkers for drug prediction and conducted molecular docking analysis on drugs with potential development value. A total of 13 PI-Ferr-DEGs were recognized. Machine learning and validation confirmed toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) as ferroptosis biomarkers in PI. In addition, GSEA was significantly enriched by the biomarkers in the cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and chemokine signaling pathway. Immune infiltration analysis revealed that the levels of B cells, M1 macrophages, and natural killer cells differed significantly in PI. Ibudilast and fedratinib were predicted as potential drugs for PI that target TLR4 and FLT3, respectively. Finally, the occurrence of ferroptosis and the expression of the identified key markers in gingival fibroblasts under inflammatory conditions were validated by RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence analysis. This study identified TLR4 and FLT3 as ferroptosis and immune cell infiltration signatures in PI, unraveling potential novel targets to treat PI.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyFerroptosisMachine LearningPeri-ImplantitisBiomarkersGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMolecular Docking SimulationToll-Like Receptor 4BiomarkersToll-Like Receptor 4ferroptosisFLT3immune infiltrationmachine learningperi-implantitisTLR4

Identifiers

PMID40362543
PMCPMC12072437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.