Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40362434›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

rDNA Copy Number Variation and Methylation in Human and Mouse Sperm.

Ramya Potabattula, Marcus Dittrich, Thomas Hahn, Martin Schorsch, Grazyna Ewa Ptak, Thomas Haaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ramya PotabattulaInstitute of Human Genetics, Julius Maximilians University, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2858-8104
Marcus DittrichInstitute of Human Genetics, Julius Maximilians University, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
Thomas HahnFertility Center, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany.
Martin SchorschFertility Center, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany.
Grazyna Ewa PtakMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology (MCB), Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland.
Thomas HaafInstitute of Human Genetics, Julius Maximilians University, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0737-0763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, droplet digital PCR and deep bisulfite sequencing were used to study the absolute and active rDNA copy number (CN) and the effect of paternal age on human and mouse sperm. The absolute CN ranged from 98 to 404 (219 ± 47) in human and from 98 to 177 (133 ± 14) in mouse sperm. Methylation of the human upstream control element/core promoter (UCE/CP) region and the 5' external transcribed spacer, as well as that of the mouse CP, the spacer promoter, and 28S rDNA, significantly increased with donor age and absolute CN. Overall, rDNA hypomethylation was much more pronounced in mouse sperm, with 101.7 ± 11.4 copies showing a completely (0%) unmethylated and 11.3 ± 2.8 (8.5%) a slightly methylated (1-10%) CP region, compared to humans with 25.7 ± 9.5 (12%) completely unmethylated and 83.0 ± 19.8 slightly methylated UCE/CP regions. Although the absolute CN was much higher in human sperm, the number of copies with a hypomethylated (0-10%) promoter was comparable in humans (108.7 ± 28.3) and mice (113.0 ± 12.2). However, in mice, the majority (77%) of all copies were completely unmethylated, whereas in humans a high percentage (38%) showed one or two single CpG methylation errors. These different germline methylation dynamics may be due to species differences in reproductive strategies and lifespan. Complete demethylation of the sperm rDNA promoter in mice may be essential for embryonic genome activation, which already occurs at the 2-cell stage in mice and at the 4-8-cell stage in humans. The paternal age effect has been conserved between humans and mice with some notable differences. In humans, the number of hypomethylated (0-10%) copies decreased with age, whereas in mice only the completely unmethylated copies decreased with age. The number of methylated rDNA copies (>1% in mice and >10% in humans) significantly increased with age.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationDNA, RibosomalSpermatozoaAdultAnimalsHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedPaternal AgePromoter Regions, GeneticDNA, Ribosomalabsolute rDNA copy numberactive rDNA copy numberaging human and mouse germlinedeep bisulfite sequencingdroplet digital PCRsperm rDNA methylation

Identifiers

PMID40362434
PMCPMC12071970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.