ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Therapeutic Effects of Two Different Molecular Weights of Orally Administered Hyaluronan, Both as Monotherapy and in Combination with Methotrexate in a Rat Model of Arthritis.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural Bioactive Compounds in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experimental Evidence from Adjuvant Arthritis Model Supporting Combination Strategies with Methotrexate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by joint inflammation and systemic involvement. This study investigates the therapeutic potential of oral hyaluronan (HA) with different molecular weights (SHA: 0.99 MDa and VHA: 1.73 MDa) as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in a preclinical adjuvant arthritis (AA) model in Lewis rats. The aim was to evaluate the impact of these treatments on biometric, inflammatory, and oxidative stress parameters. The preliminary study tested two doses of HA (0.5 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg), and the pivotal study focused on the combination of 0.5 mg/kg HA with 0.3 mg/kg MTX. Based on our experimental findings on combined therapy, the MTX + SHA combination demonstrated superior efficacy compared to MTX + VHA and MTX monotherapy. Specifically, the MTX + SHA regimen significantly promoted weight gain and reduced hind-paw volume in all monitored experimental days. This treatment markedly reduced plasmatic IL-17A levels (day 21) and GGT activity in both the spleen and joints (day 28), showing the most pronounced effects among all groups, including the MTX monotherapy group. The MTX + VHA combination showed a therapeutic response comparable to MTX alone, indicating no additional benefit. These findings suggest a superior efficacy of the MTX + SHA combination in comparison to other studied treatments. The overall efficacy can be ranked as: MTX ≈ MTX + VHA < MTX + SHA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.