ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Deep Learning-Based Classification of Canine Cataracts from Ocular B-Mode Ultrasound Images.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Livestock Farming and Biomedical Engineering: Assessing Feed Quality, Animal Health, and Behavior Using Machine Learning for Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Accuracy of Diagnosis and Anticipation of Future Treatment in Pediatric Peripelvic Infections: The Role of Multisurgeon Review and Implications for Future Machine Learning Algorithms.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cataracts are a prevalent cause of vision loss in dogs, and timely diagnosis is essential for effective treatment. This study aimed to develop and evaluate deep learning models to automatically classify canine cataracts from ocular ultrasound images. A dataset of 3155 ultrasound images (comprising 1329 No cataract, 614 Cortical, 1033 Mature, and 179 Hypermature cases) was used to train and validate four widely used deep learning models (AlexNet, EfficientNetB3, ResNet50, and DenseNet161). Data augmentation and normalization techniques were applied to address category imbalance. DenseNet161 demonstrated the best performance, achieving a test accuracy of 92.03% and an F1-score of 0.8744. The confusion matrix revealed that the model attained the highest accuracy for the No cataract category (99.0%), followed by Cortical (90.3%) and Mature (86.5%) cataracts, while Hypermature cataracts were classified with lower accuracy (78.6%). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed strong discriminative ability, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99. Visual interpretation using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping indicated that the model effectively focused on clinically relevant regions. This deep learning-based classification framework shows significant potential for assisting veterinarians in diagnosing cataracts, thereby improving clinical decision-making in veterinary ophthalmology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.