Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40362104›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

AI and Data Analytics in the Dairy Farms: A Scoping Review.

Osvaldo Palma, Lluis M Plà-Aragonés, Alejandro Mac Cawley, Víctor M Albornoz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Osvaldo PalmaDepartment of Mathematics, Universidad de Lleida, 73 Jaume II, 25001 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-0352-0864
Lluis M Plà-AragonésDepartment of Mathematics, Universidad de Lleida, 73 Jaume II, 25001 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-0207
Alejandro Mac CawleyDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-4732
Víctor M AlbornozDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Campus Santiago Vitacura, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Santiago 7650568, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8500-1250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The strong growth of the world population will cause a major increase in demand for bovine milk, making it necessary to use various technologies to increase milk production efficiently. Some technologies that can contribute to solving part of this problem are those related to data analytics tools, big data, and sensor development. It is timely to review modern technologies and data analytics methods for milk predictions in view of supporting decision-making in dairy farms. To this end, a scoping review was carried out, which resulted in 151 articles of interest. Among the most important results, we found that (i) the identified studies are relatively recent with an average publication time of 5.95 years; (ii) the scope of the selected studies is mostly concentrated on milk and prediction (29%), early detection of lameness (26%), and timely detection of mastitis (13%); (iii) the type of analysis is mostly predictive (87%), and prescriptive is barely present (3%); (iv) the types of input data used in the studies are preferably historical (70%), and real-time data (25%) are used less frequently; (v) we found that the method of artificial neural networks (47%) and the convolutional neural networks (24%) are the most used for the studies regarding bovine milk output predictions. In the selected studies, the artificial neural network methods have considerable accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 Scores on average but with high ranges and standard deviations. (vi) Simulation tools are scarcely used, being present in 4% of cases. In the treatment of variability, the models reviewed are mostly deterministic (77%), and the stochastic models (5%) are considered in a small number of cases. Based on our analysis, we conclude that future research on decision-making tools will benefit from the advantages of artificial neural networks in data analytics combined with optimization-simulation methods.

Indexed as

data analyticsmachine learningmilk productionneural networkssimulation

Identifiers

PMID40362104
PMCPMC12071016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.