ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Enhancing Genomic Prediction Accuracy with a Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Model Integrating Genome-Wide Association Study Results.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Genomic prediction accuracy for low hydrogen cyanide selection in fresh cassava roots. Comparative model analysis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Genetic Strategies for Improving Pig Robustness: Reducing Antibiotic Use Through Enhanced Resilience and Disease Resistance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a genetic breeding method that uses genome-wide marker information to improve the accuracy of the prediction of complex traits. The single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) model, which integrates pedigree, phenotypic, and genomic data, has improved genomic prediction. However, ssGBLUP assumes that all markers contribute equally to genetic variance, which can limit its predictive accuracy, especially for traits controlled by major genes. To overcome this limitation, we integrate results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) into an enhanced ssGBLUP framework, termed single-step genome-wide association assisted BLUP (ssGWABLUP). Our approach assigns differential weights to markers on the basis of their GWAS results, thereby increasing the contribution of effective markers while diminishing the influence of ineffective ones during the construction of the genomic relationship matrix. By incorporating pseudo quantitative trait nucleotides (pQTNs) as covariates, we aim to capture the effects of markers closely associated with major causal variants, leading to the development of the ssGWABLUP_pQTNs. Compared with weighted ssGBLUP (WssGBLUP), the ssGWABLUP model demonstrated superior accuracy and dispersion across different genetic architectures. We then compared the performance of our proposed ssGWABLUP_pQTNs model against both ssGBLUP and ssGWABLUP across various genetic scenarios. Our results demonstrate that ssGWABLUP_pQTNs outperforms other models in terms of prediction accuracy, particularly in scenarios with simpler genetic architectures. Additionally, evaluation using pig dataset confirmed the effectiveness of ssGWABLUP_pQTNs, highlighting its potential for practical breeding applications. The incorporation of pQTNs and a weighted genomic relationship matrix presents a promising and potentially scalable approach to further enhance genomic prediction, with potential implications for improving the accuracy of genomic selection in breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.