Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40362050›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Management Strategies for Napier Grass (

Anamika Roy, Biplob Kumer Roy, Cameron Edward Fisher Clark, Muhammad Khairul Bashar, Nathu Ram Sarker, Nasrin Sultana, Md Mostain Billah, Mohammad Al-Mamun, Mohammad Rafiqul Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anamika RoyDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.
Biplob Kumer RoyBangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh.
Cameron Edward Fisher ClarkGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-2046
Muhammad Khairul BasharBangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4867-5483
Nathu Ram SarkerKrishi Gobeshona Foundation, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council Complex, Farmgate, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh.
Nasrin SultanaBangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh.
Md Mostain BillahBangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0007-4760-2542
Mohammad Al-MamunDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4881-1705
Mohammad Rafiqul IslamDairy Science Group, Livestock Production and Welfare Group, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9354-432X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Napier grass is widely used across the tropics and subtropics as a feed for dairy and beef cattle, but its quality is poor under current management with resultant poor animal productivity. Current management is focused on achieving high yields and, as such, is harvested at ground level with longer harvest interval when grass reaches 200 cm or higher, which reduces quality. The opportunity to improve the nutritive value of this grass is largely unexplored alongside the opportunity to increase livestock productivity and food security in the tropics and subtropics. Here we determined the impact of leaf number (total) or stage (LS; 6, 9 and 14) at harvest, and harvest severity height (SH; cutting or harvest height from the ground; 5, 10 and 20 cm), on the nutritive value of Napier grass (cv. Pakchong) across one year. Napier grass was sown (from cutting) at a density of 50 cm × 50 cm with three replicates per treatment. Increasing LS from 6 to 14 decreased crude protein (CP) content from 184 g/kg DM to 118 g/kg DM and metabolizable energy (ME) content from 10.4 to 7.3 MJ/kg DM. These results suggest that Napier grass should be harvested at a lower LS to increase plant nutritive value but there was a trade-off between yield and quality as yield decreased by half to improve such quality. The impact of offering Napier grass harvested at 6, 9 or 14 LS on cattle growth was then determined across 113 days in a second experiment. Red Chittagong bulls were enrolled at a weight of a 181.9 ± 2.30 (Mean ± SE) Kg with an age of between 18 and 22 months. The 6 LS treatment cattle had a greater growth rate and higher feed conversion ratio (FCR) than the 14 LS treatment (610 versus 270 g/day and 6.4 versus 16.2, respectively) indicating a trade-off of yield with quality. Our results demonstrate that Napier grass should be harvested at 6 LS with 10 cm SH for feed nutritive value, cattle growth and FCR. Further research is required to ameliorate yield loss associated with this recommended management strategy with a focus on increasing plant density.

Indexed as

biomass yieldgrowthin vitroleaf stageNapier grassnutritive value

Identifiers

PMID40362050
PMCPMC12071006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.