Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40362010›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Perception Toward Wolves Are Driven by Economic Status and Religion Across Their Distribution Range.

Dipanjan Naha, Stefanie Döringer, Marco Heurich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dipanjan NahaIndependent Researcher, Kolkata 700047, India.
Stefanie DöringerDepartment of National Park Monitoring and Animal Management, Bavarian Forest National Park, FreyungerStraße, 94481 Grafenau, Germany.
Marco HeurichDepartment of National Park Monitoring and Animal Management, Bavarian Forest National Park, FreyungerStraße, 94481 Grafenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0051-2930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective conservation of large mammals depends on how people perceive them. Grey wolves have a widespread distribution globally, and their recent recolonization of human-dominated landscapes offers an excellent opportunity to understand the heterogeneity in their perception across continents. Our analysis included all quantitative studies (118 articles) conducted in 35 countries through a systematic review process, published globally between 1980-2023 and indexed in Web of Science and Google Scholar. Fifty-four percent of the studies reported a negative perception toward wolves. Most studies conducted in Asia reported a negative perception, while 56% of studies conducted in Europe and 48% in North America reported a positive perception. Fifty-four percent of studies from Western Europe and forty percent of studies from Slavic Russian cultural regions reported positive perceptions. Respondents from low-income countries elicited the most negative perceptions. We identified the predominant religion and economic status of a country as dominant factors determining perception. Studies conducted in countries with Hinduism as the predominant religion reported a negative perception toward wolves. We recommend that future studies on human-wolf interactions must prioritize regions within central Europe, parts of Asia, and Russia. A global human-wolf coexistence strategy should consider the social factors driving attitude toward the species.

Indexed as

attitudecarnivorecoexistencereviewsocial driverstolerance

Identifiers

PMID40362010
PMCPMC12071121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.