Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361889›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Will PET/MR Imaging Replace PET/CT for Pediatric Applications?

Gabriele Masselli, Chiara Di Bella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriele MasselliDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Chiara Di BellaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-8960-5998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a modern, highly advanced diagnostic tool that offers numerous advantages in the treatment and management of some pediatric pathologies. The use of PET/MR in children provides high-resolution images with outstanding tissue characterization, as well as important metabolic and physiological information; it is not only essential for early diagnosis, but also for the assessment and management of oncological, neurological, and cardiovascular diseases. The hybrid PET/MR is a multimodal approach that reduces the need for separate examinations, minimizes radiation exposure, and improves the overall experience for pediatric patients. In addition, PET/MR, by combining functional data, allows for more precise therapeutic planning and monitoring of treatment responses, optimizing clinical interventions especially with regard to staging and follow-up. This review will explore the benefits, weaknesses, and emerging applications of PET/MR in pediatric patients.

Indexed as

imagingnuclear medicinepediatricPET/CTPET/MR

Identifiers

PMID40361889
PMCPMC12072180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.