Differentiating Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease from Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Resource-Limited Settings: A Pragmatic Model for Reducing Misguided Antitubercular Treatment.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Molecular epidemiology of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in clinical samples from Jiangxi Province, 2021-2023.BMC microbiology · 2026
   Article
2. Development and internal validation of a LASSO-based clinical prediction model for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease versus pulmonary tuberculosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026
   Article
3. Analysis of High-Risk Factors for Tuberculosis Retreatment Based on Machine Learning and Latent Class Analysis.Infection and drug resistance · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as