Effectiveness of Virtual and Augmented Reality for Emergency Healthcare Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Effect of repeated exposure to an identical multi-user virtual reality anaphylaxis scenario on paramedic trainee performance: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026
   Trial
2. Augmented Reality-Based Training for a Rapid Blood Transfusion Device Among Emergency Nurses: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026
   Trial
3. An elephant in the room amplifies discomfort when the virtual reality space matches physical reality.iScience · 2026
   Article
4. Immediate learning outcomes of AI- and sensor-integrated versus face-to-face CPR retraining for chest compression quality: A randomized trial.Digital health
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as