ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Impact of Foot Surgery and Pharmacological Treatments on Functionality and Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently leads to foot deformities, significantly impacting pain, mobility, and quality of life. Surgical and pharmacological treatments are prescribed to manage symptoms, but their long-term effects on foot function remain unclear. This study evaluates the impact of different treatment approaches, including surgery, methotrexate (MTX), and biological therapy (Bio), on foot functionality and pain progression over five years.
methodsA longitudinal cohort study was conducted with 103 RA patients classified into five groups: surgery, MTX < 10 years, MTX ≥ 10 years, Bio < 10 years, and Bio ≥ 10 years. Data from 2018 and 2023 were compared using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI), and the Foot Function Index (FFI). Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and ROC curve analysis to assess differences between groups and identify key progression factors.
resultsPatients with ≥10 years of disease duration and non-biological treatment (MTX ≥ 10 years) experienced the most severe deterioration in foot function, with a mean FFI increase of +11.89 points (
conclusionsPatients with long-standing RA on non-biologic therapy exhibited the greatest decline in foot function, whereas early treatment with MTX (<10 years of disease duration) appeared to slow deterioration. Surgery did not consistently provide functional benefits, and biologics helped mitigate progression, though outcomes varied. These findings underscore the importance of early intervention and personalized treatment strategies for foot preservation in RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.