ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Consumer Perception of Irradiated Food Products in the Abai Region of Kazakhstan.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Food irradiation is a scientifically validated method for improving food safety and shelf life, yet public acceptance remains limited due to persistent misconceptions. This study investigates consumer perceptions of irradiated food in the Abai region of Kazakhstan, an area historically affected by radiation exposure, though this context is not explicitly addressed. A structured questionnaire was administered to 420 adult residents across urban and rural districts, collecting data on familiarity, knowledge, perceived risks and benefits, willingness to consume, and influencing factors such as trust in authorities and preference for natural foods. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, including Pearson correlation and Duncan's test, were employed. Results reveal widespread knowledge gaps-only 20% correctly rejected the myth that irradiated food is radioactive-yet nearly half of respondents expressed willingness to purchase such products. Perceived health risk was high across all food categories, especially infant food, but this did not consistently predict avoidance. Demographic variables such as education and age influenced perceptions of necessity, while gender and trust in authorities had minimal impact. The study concludes that although consumer knowledge is low, moderate openness exists toward irradiated food, suggesting that public education and clear communication could play a pivotal role in building acceptance for this food safety intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.