Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361707›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Legume Proteins in Food Products: Extraction Techniques, Functional Properties, and Current Challenges.

Grazielle Náthia-Neves, Adane Tilahun Getachew, Ádina L Santana, Charlotte Jacobsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Physicochemical Properties of Safflower (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grazielle Náthia-NevesNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4561-7779
Adane Tilahun GetachewNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1260-0575
Ádina L SantanaGrain Science and Industry Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0799-0946
Charlotte JacobsenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3540-9669

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2022 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement 101106463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of protein extraction from legume sources, with a focus on both conventional and emerging techniques. Particular attention is given to the impact of innovative methods on protein functionality, a key factor for food applications. Due to their nutritional profile and techno-functional properties, legumes are increasingly regarded as promising alternatives to animal-based protein sources in the food industry. Traditional extraction methods, such as alkaline and acidic extraction, are discussed and compared with novel approaches including enzymatic extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ohmic heating (OH), subcritical water extraction (SWE), deep eutectic solvents (DES), and dry fractionation. The potential of these emerging technologies to improve protein yield and functionality is critically assessed, alongside key challenges such as scalability, cost-effectiveness, and potential allergenicity. This review also identifies current research gaps and highlights opportunities for innovation in sustainable protein extraction. Therefore, this review contributes to the development of more efficient, functional, and sustainable protein ingredients production, highlighting the role of innovative extraction technologies in shaping the future of plant-based foods.

Indexed as

emerging techniquesgreen extraction methodslegumesplant-based proteinsprotein extraction

Identifiers

PMID40361707
PMCPMC12071647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.