Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361677›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Innovative Resource-Saving Equipment for Safflower Processing to Improve Oil Quality.

Maigul Mursalykova, Gulnara Kokayeva, Mukhtarbek Kakimov, Bożena Gajdzik, Radosław Wolniak, Damian Dzienniak, Michał Bembenek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maigul MursalykovaDepartment of Technological Equipment, Shakarim University of Semey City, Semey 071412, Kazakhstan.
Gulnara KokayevaDepartment of Technological Machinery and Equipment, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University, Astana 010011, Kazakhstan.
Mukhtarbek KakimovDepartment of Technology of Food and Processing Industries, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University, Astana 010011, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0008-9274-2816
Bożena GajdzikDepartment of Industrial Informatics, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0408-1691
Radosław WolniakDepartment of Economics and Informatics, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0317-9811
Damian DzienniakDepartment of Manufacturing Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Krakow, A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-9673
Michał BembenekDepartment of Manufacturing Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Krakow, A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7665-8058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an innovative, resource-efficient apparatus for safflower oil production, designed for small- and medium-sized enterprises. The developed equipment integrates grinding and pressing into a single operation, optimizing extraction efficiency while reducing operational costs and processing time. A comparative analysis of the physicochemical and fatty acid profiles of safflower oil produced using traditional and combined grinding-pressing methods confirmed the superiority of the new approach. Optimal process parameters were identified: pressing time (

Indexed as

biologically valuable productcombined grinding and pressingfatty acid compositionoil quality enhancementoptimal processing parametersphysicochemical propertiesresource-efficient equipmentsafflower oil productionsmall and medium enterprisessustainable oil production

Identifiers

PMID40361677
PMCPMC12071249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.