ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating the Potential for Different Fabrics to Protect Grapes from Contamination by Smoke.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oak aging mitigates the sensory impact of smoke taint in Cabernet Sauvignon wine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Screening Potential Coating Materials to Reduce the Absorption of Volatile Phenols into Grapes During Simulated Wildfire Conditions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vineyard smoke exposure can lead to the accumulation of free and glycosylated volatile phenols (VPs) in grapes, negatively affecting wine quality. Activated carbon fibre (ACF) cloth has proven effective in mitigating smoke contamination of grapes, but its commercial use is hindered by low tensile strength and light transmission. This study therefore compared the efficacy of different fabrics (polyester, polypropylene, cotton and viscose) to mitigate the smoke contamination of grapes (benchmarking against ACF cloth), alongside their physical properties (i.e., tensile strength and air permeability). Polyester and polypropylene provided limited protection, whereas grapes enclosed in cotton or viscose had VP profiles that were comparable to grapes enclosed in ACF cloth (i.e., VP concentrations ≤ 5.3 µg/kg). In a subsequent trial, ACF cloth prevented the uptake of >90% of smoke-derived VPs during ten successive smoke treatments, but after repeated smoke exposure, VP concentrations had increased in grapes enclosed in cotton and viscose, presumably due to saturation. Washing and drying restored the protection afforded by cotton and viscose but resulted in the disintegration of the ACF cloth. However, the application of a non-woven fabric to one or both sides of the ACF cloth improved tensile strength, without significantly compromising air permeability. These findings demonstrate the potential for fabric coverings to be used to mitigate the occurrence of smoke taint in the vineyard, with ACF affording superior protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.