ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring Chinese Consumers' Perception and Potential Acceptance of Cell-Cultured Meat and Plant-Based Meat: A Focus Group Study and Content Analysis.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Could Cultured Meat Be a Sustainable and Safe Source of Protein?Molecular nutrition & food research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: In recent years, meat alternatives, including plant-based and animal cell-cultured meat, have attracted substantial interest among Chinese food science researchers and consumers, prompting considerable debate; (2) Methods: This study utilizes qualitative research methods, specifically focus group interviews with 59 participants across five administrative regions and seven cities in China, to explore consumer knowledge, perceptions, and potential acceptance of meat substitutes; (3) Results: The findings reveal that Chinese consumers generally exhibit a low level of understanding of new meat substitutes, particularly animal cell-cultured meat. Although participants acknowledge the potential environmental, resource-saving, and animal welfare benefits associated with meat substitutes, they also express concerns about perceived risks, such as artificial taste, high costs, market monopolization, diminished consumer welfare, and adverse impacts on traditional animal husbandry and employment. Despite a willingness to try meat substitutes, the regular purchase and consumption of these remain limited. The acceptance of meat substitutes is influenced by factors including personal characteristics, price, safety, and the authenticity of taste; (4) Conclusions: The study concludes that legislative support, technological advancements in production and regulation, price reductions, and the establishment of a robust traceability system may enhance consumer confidence and acceptance of meat substitutes in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.