ReviewCancers2025
Unraveling Venetoclax Resistance: Navigating the Future of HMA/Venetoclax-Refractory AML in the Molecular Era.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ferroptosis-cuproptosis crosstalk in hematological malignancies: multi-omics insights into gene-regulated cell death and emerging therapeutic opportunities.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Venetoclax for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: Prospects, resistance mechanisms and management strategies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- The role of the WD40-repeat protein family in cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- A Nomogram Prediction Model and Scoring System for Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Venetoclax Combined with Hypomethylating Agents.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Apoptosis signaling and cancer targeted therapy: from bench to bespoke.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Computer-aided drug design in acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review of advances, challenges, and future prospect.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Hijacking the helpers: platelet and neutrophil trafficking in AML and therapeutic exploitation.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- The evolving landscape of regulatory T cells in leukemia: from mechanisms to advanced immunotherapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Progress in targeted therapy for prostate cancer via cell surface proteins (Review).Biomedical reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Targeting the BCL2 Family: Advances and Challenges in BH3 Mimetic-Based Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Acute myeloid leukemia drug resistance: targetable nodes and the clinical trajectory of small-molecule inhibitors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Factors affecting response and resistance to venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has traditionally been linked to a poor prognosis, particularly in older patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The advent of Venetoclax, a powerful oral BH3 mimetic targeting anti-apoptotic protein BCL2, has significantly advanced AML treatment. Its combination with the hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA/VEN) has become a standard treatment for this group of AML patients, demonstrating a 65% overall response rate and a median overall survival of 14.7 months, compared to 22% and 8 months with azacitidine monotherapy, respectively. However, resistance and relapses remain common, representing a significant clinical challenge. Recent studies have identified molecular alterations, such as mutations in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.