ArticleCancers2025
Computer-Aided Detection (CADe) of Small Metastatic Prostate Cancer Lesions on 3D PSMA PET Volumes Using Multi-Angle Maximum Intensity Projections.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to develop and evaluate a novel computer-aided detection (CADe) approach for identifying small metastatic biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa) lesions on PSMA-PET images, utilizing multi-angle Maximum Intensity Projections (MA-MIPs) and state-of-the-art (SOTA) object detection algorithms.
methodsWe fine-tuned and evaluated 16 SOTA object detection algorithms (selected across four main categories of model types) applied to MA-MIPs as extracted from rotated 3D PSMA-PET volumes. Predicted 2D bounding boxes were back-projected to the original 3D space using the Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) algorithm. A fine-tuned Medical Segment-Anything Model (MedSAM) was then also used to segment the identified lesions within the bounding boxes.
resultsThe proposed method achieved a high detection performance for this difficult task, with the FreeAnchor model reaching an F1-score of 0.69 and a recall of 0.74. It outperformed several 3D methods in efficiency while maintaining comparable accuracy. Strong recall rates were observed for clinically relevant areas, such as local relapses (0.82) and bone metastases (0.80).
conclusionOur fully automated CADe tool shows promise in assisting physicians as a "second reader" for detecting small metastatic BCR PCa lesions on PSMA-PET images. By leveraging the strength and computational efficiency of 2D models while preserving 3D spatial information of the PSMA-PET volume, the proposed approach has the potential to improve detectability and reduce workload in cancer diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.