ArticleCancers2025
Development of an Evaluation Tool for Monitoring the Delivery of Psychosocial Care in Pediatric Oncology Settings.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delivering Care Consistent With the Psychosocial Standards-Provider Report: Implementing the Standards Together-Engaging Parents and Providers in Psychosocial Care (iSTEPPP) Study.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2025Article
- Introduction to the Special Issue on Advances in Pediatric and Adolescent Psychosocial Oncology.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In January of 2019, the University of Iowa Stead Family Children's Hospital (UI SFCH) formalized their Pediatric Psychosocial Oncology Program by utilizing 15 evidence-based Standards for Psychosocial Care for Children with Cancer and Families as a foundation for program development. The psychosocial oncology clinical team members identified ongoing gaps in care and a need to improve progress toward achieving these standards. Reviewing and analyzing the Pediatric Psychosocial Standard of Care Institutional Assessment Tool further highlighted the need for program development but also demonstrated the need to design institutionally specific objective measures to monitor program improvements over time. The current project focused on the creation of a program evaluation system with objective measures specific to the UI SFCH practice setting. Barriers such as staffing and cost were identified and addressed. Additionally, a REDCap
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.