ArticleCancers2025
Multi-Modal Graph Neural Networks for Colposcopy Data Classification and Visualization.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN1-3) Disease Grading Using a Mixture of Experts Approach.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical lesion classification is essential for early detection of cervical cancer. While deep learning methods have shown promise, most rely on single-modal data or require extensive manual annotations. This study proposes a novel Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based framework that integrates colposcopy images, segmentation masks, and graph representations for improved lesion classification.
methodsWe developed a fully connected graph-based architecture using GCNConv layers with global mean pooling and optimized it via grid search. A five-fold cross-validation protocol was employed to evaluate performance before (1-100 epochs) and after fine-tuning (101-151 epochs). Performance metrics included macro-average F1-score and validation accuracy. Visualizations were used for model interpretability.
resultsThe model achieved a macro-average F1-score of 89.4% and validation accuracy of 92.1% before fine-tuning, which improved to 94.56% and 98.98%, respectively, after fine-tuning. LIME-based visual explanations validated models focus on discriminative lesion regions.
conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of graph-based multi-modal learning for cervical lesion analysis. Collaborating with the MNJ Institute of Oncology, the framework shows promise for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.