ReviewCancers2025
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation for use in Colombia of the EORTC QLQ-THY34 questionnaire to measure quality of life in patients with thyroid cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- The influence of clinically suspected metastatic lymph node distribution on occult metastasis and recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Patterns of Lateral Lymph Node Involvement by Neck Level in cNIb Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTherapeutic lateral neck dissection is recommended for papillary thyroid cancer with metastatic lymph nodes detected on palpation or on preoperative imaging. Current guidelines recommend systematic dissection of levels IIA, III, IV and VB in these patients. Despite this recommendation, management of level V remains controversial due to a varying degree of clinical and occult lymph node involvement reported in published retrospective studies, but also due to the functional risk involved in level V dissection in which the spinal accessory nerve may be temporarily or permanently injured. The aim of this review was to address the issues involved in level VB dissection and to provide our view of surgical management of level VB.
methodNarrrative review.
resultWe propose a new concept of a partial or "
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.