Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361407›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Elastography Enhances the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasonography in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Superficial Lymphadenopathies.

Novella Pugliese, Marco Picardi, Claudia Giordano, Annamaria Vincenzi, Rosaria Cappiello, Massimo Mascolo, Fabrizio Pane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Elastography for distinguishing lymphoma from benign and metastatic lymphadenopathy: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Novella PuglieseDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2714-5109
Marco PicardiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Claudia GiordanoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Annamaria VincenziDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Rosaria CappielloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Pathology Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Massimo MascoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Pathology Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2576-220X
Fabrizio PaneDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesLymph node (LN) evaluation is critical in diagnosing, staging, and managing various diseases, particularly lymphoma and metastatic cancer. Although conventional ultrasound (US) is widely used for this purpose, its limitations in reliably differentiating between benign and malignant LNs persist. Ultrasound elastography (US-E), which evaluates tissue stiffness, has emerged as a promising adjunct to improve diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of conventional US, power Doppler US, and strain elastography (SE) in distinguishing malignant from benign superficial lymph nodes.

methodsIn this prospective study, 214 consecutive patients referred for US of enlarged LNs were enrolled. Conventional B-mode US, power Doppler, and SE were performed, and the strain ratio (SR) was calculated as a measure of LN stiffness. Histopathological examination was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariable logistic regression models were applied to determine the independent predictive role of SR.

resultsAmong the 214 LNs (one for each patient), 74 (34.6%) were benign and 140 (65.4%) were malignant. The SR showed a significant association with malignancy (

conclusionsUS-E, particularly SR, is a valuable tool in the differentiation of benign and malignant superficial LNs. SR provides significant diagnostic value, especially in hematological neoplasms like Hodgkin lymphoma, and can serve as an independent predictor of malignancy. This technique, when used in combination with conventional US features, offers enhanced diagnostic performance for LN evaluation.

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracyelastographylymph nodelymphomastrain ratioultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40361407
PMCPMC12071056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.