ArticleCancers2025
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists and Cancer Prevention: Methodological Pitfalls in Observational Studies.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cancer outcomes and biological mechanisms among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Insulin Resistance as a Systemic Metabolic Risk State for Cancer: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Prevention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Need for and design of a trial to test efficacy of weight loss interventions for cancer prevention: an international consensus using expert nominal group and Delphi methods.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- GLP-1 receptor agonists and cancer: current clinical evidence and translational opportunities for preclinical research.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Obesity as a Catalyst for Endometrial Hyperplasia and Cancer Progression: A Narrative Review of Epidemiology, Molecular Pathways, and Prevention.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObesity, commonly approximated by body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m OBJECTIVES/
methodsThe aim of this opinion paper is to critically appraise the methodological challenges and pitfalls associated with studying the question 'does weight loss through use of GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce cancer risk' through observational studies, and exemplify this through critique of a recent study published in this journal.
resultsWe modified the ROBINS-E framework for assessing risk of bias, identifying seven methodological criteria specific to this research question, against which data should be interpreted. These include adequate adjustment for key parameters of body fatness; immortal time bias; treatment allocation bias; survival bias; cumulative drug dose effect; sufficient sojourn time between drug intervention and cancer presentation; and treatment effect specific to obesity-related cancers. We found that 6 out of 7 methodological criteria were at high risk of bias.
conclusionsCancer prevention through GLP-1 receptor agonist use should be explored; however, there are several methodological challenges to overcome in understanding this link before it can inform clinical practice and policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.