ReviewCancers2025
Advancing Leukemia Management Through Liquid Biopsy: Insights into Biomarkers and Clinical Utility.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging regenerative strategies for spinal cord injury: exosome-derived mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Microfluidics for Blood Disorders and Hematological Disease Monitoring and Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Precision oncology in gynecologic cancers: molecular taxonomy, biomarker-guided therapeutics, and the challenge of therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Progress in targeted therapy for prostate cancer via cell surface proteins (Review).Biomedical reports · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing: A Review of Its Transformative Impact on Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Resistance Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid biopsy is classically defined as the detection of biomarkers in bodily fluids. One of these biomarkers can be circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) released by healthy or cancer cells during apoptosis. These fragments can be quantified and molecularly characterized by techniques like digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). By identifying common genetic and epigenetic alterations associated with specific cancer types, cfDNA or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can serve as robust biomarkers for monitoring tumor initiation and progression. Other biomarkers, such as circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), extracellular vesicles, or circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are also applied in this context. Liquid biopsy has gained attention as a versatile tool for cancer diagnostics, prognosis, therapeutic monitoring, and minimal residual disease (MRD) detection across various malignancies, including hematological cancers like myeloid and lymphoid leukemias. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of liquid biopsy usage in leukemia, with a specific focus on the clinical utility of ctDNA, miRNAs, and exosomes in monitoring treatment response, tracking clonal evolution, and detecting minimal residual disease. Our review emphasizes the translational implications of these tools for improving patient outcomes and outlines current challenges in their integration into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.