ArticleCancers2025
Robot-Assisted Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Safe and Effective Option for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Especially for Novice Surgeons.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRadical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Minimally invasive techniques like robotic (RARNU) and laparoscopic (LRNU) RNU offer potential benefits over open surgery, but their comparative oncologic outcomes are debated.
methodsThis retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 2037 Taiwanese patients undergoing RNU between 2010 and 2022. Missing data was addressed using multiple imputations. Overlap weighting was applied to balance patient characteristics between the RARNU and LRNU groups. Survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.
resultsAfter excluding the missing data, 405 patients underwent RARNU, and 1262 underwent LRNU. After adjusting for baseline differences, both groups showed comparable rates of surgical complications, residual tumor, UTUC-related mortality, and disease recurrence. The median follow-up was similar (52.4 vs. 51.6 months,
conclusionsThis study shows that RARNU for UTUC has comparable oncological and perioperative outcomes to pure LRNU. RARNU may be easier for surgeons to adopt, particularly those with limited laparoscopic experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.