Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2025
Baseline Neurocognitive Functioning Among Children Treated for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Dana Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Study 16-001.
Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03020030 (Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Adolescents
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study describes neurocognitive functioning during the first month of induction chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and associations with age, sex, risk of relapse, maternal education, household material hardship (HMH), and oxidative stress.
methodsPatients treated on protocol 16-001 (NCT03020030) across eight North American sites (2017-2022) consented for optional testing using Cogstate at six timepoints throughout treatment. The baseline data presented were collected within the first month after diagnosis.
resultsAmong 406 eligible patients, 330 (81%) consented (53% males, mean age = 8.8 years, SD = 4.7). Over 63% of participants performed within normal limits for their age range. Additionally, no relationship was observed at baseline between neurocognition and maternal education, HMH, or oxidative stress. In contrast, a linear relationship was observed between older age and weaker psychomotor speed (p < 0.0001), attention (p < 0.0001), and working memory (p = 0.019). Males also demonstrated faster psychomotor speed (p = 0.0027), while females demonstrated stronger visual learning (p = 0.011). Furthermore, having a higher risk of relapse was associated with slower psychomotor speed (p = 0.006) and weaker attention (p = 0.033).
conclusionsOur findings indicate that most ALL patients in this study who were assessed at baseline did not display cognitive impairments, except for a small subset of participants who were below age expectations across domains. These baseline findings also identify subgroups based upon age, sex, and ALL risk classification that begin medical treatment with neurocognitive delays, warranting monitoring to elucidate whether exposure to therapy further impacts these domains. Additionally, the lack of impact on neurocognitive functioning at baseline of maternal education, HMH, and/or oxidative stress enables subsequent assessments to effectively identify the potential emergence of deficits as a result of exposure to medical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.