Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361247›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurodegeneration2025

Mouse models of Anti-Aβ immunotherapies.

Philip Pikus, R Scott Turner, G William Rebeck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip PikusDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3970 Reservoir Rd, NW, District of Columbia, Washington, 20007, USA.
R Scott TurnerDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Rd, NW, District of Columbia, Washington, 20007, USA.
G William RebeckDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3970 Reservoir Rd, NW, District of Columbia, Washington, 20007, USA. gwr2@georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6276-248X

Funding

Aging and Alzheimer's Research Training (AART)T32AG071745 · NIA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI G WILLIAM REBECK · 2021 to 2026
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG071745NIA NIH HHS T32AG071745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of anti-amyloid-beta (Aβ) immunotherapies as the first disease modifying therapy for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a breakthrough of basic research and translational science. MAIN TEXT: Genetically modified mouse models developed to study AD neuropathology and physiology were used for the discovery of Aβ immunotherapies and helped ultimately propel therapies to FDA approval. Nonetheless, the combination of modest efficacy and significant rates of an adverse side effect (amyloid related imaging abnormalities, ARIA), has prompted reverse translational research in these same mouse models to better understand the mechanism of the therapies.

conclusionThis review considers the use of these mouse models in understanding the mechanisms of Aβ clearance, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), blood brain barrier breakdown, neuroinflammation, and neuronal dysfunction in response to Aβ immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesDisease Models, AnimalImmunotherapyAnimalsHumansMiceMice, TransgenicAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloid-betaARIABlood brain barrierCerebral amyloid angiopathyImmunotherapyMicrogliaMouse modelsNeuronal dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40361247
PMCPMC12076828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.