ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Cancers missed, women dismissed yet persist: natural language processing of online forums.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EBCC-15 manifesto: Removing age-related barriers to improve equity in breast cancer care.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify gaps and delays in the detection of early onset cancer.
methodsWe examined firsthand experiences shared on an online discussion board hosted by the Young Survival Coalition-an advocacy group for young adults diagnosed with breast cancer-spanning the years 2009 to 2019. We used natural language processing to detect codes: "first signs and symptoms," "steps to diagnosis," "healthcare interactions," "patient-provider-system feelings," and "staging/type." In the training dataset, we used qualitative content analysis to code text from 750 of the forum's 571,914 posts. We developed and evaluated automated approaches to quantify the proportion of codes in all posts. Lastly, we qualitatively reviewed the classified posts to identify areas for improvement along the clinical pathway.
resultsThe vast majority (81%) of young adults self-detected their breast cancer rather than the cancer being detected through a clinical breast exam. Young adults (70%) were dissatisfied with their care because they encountered delays at three crossroads along the clinical pathway: 1) whether the clinician ordered tests or dismissed the individual as too young; 2) whether imaging modalities were sensitive or not; 3) whether a biopsy confirmed or missed the cancer. Mental health challenges and parenting pressures compounded these delays. True positive cases who experienced these delays strongly encouraged their peers to self-advocate, persist and insist on further testing until diagnosed accurately.
conclusionDismissal and delays in diagnosis of early onset breast cancer mean potentially worse prognosis since later stage cancers are more aggressive with fewer treatment options. The perspectives from survivors highlight the need for more research informing early detection in young adults by considering breast awareness, use of MRI and ultrasound, biopsy referrals for exhibited breast symptoms in the absence of positive imaging, and sociomedical support for individuals in their role as current or future parent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.