Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361230›Full record

SynthesisAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025

Global knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards antimicrobial resistance among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abdolreza Sotoodeh Jahromi, Negin Namavari, Mohammad Jokar, Nader Sharifi, Samira Soleimanpour, Negin Naserzadeh, Vahid Rahmanian

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients, 2.0.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdolreza Sotoodeh JahromiZoonoses Research Center, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-2113
Negin NamavariSchool of Medicine, Peymaniye Hospital, Jahrom University of Medical Science, Jahrom, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8782-9636
Mohammad JokarFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4888-4119
Nader SharifiDepartment of Public Health, Khomein University of Medical Sciences, Khomein, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3094-235X
Samira SoleimanpourMedical Librarianship and Information Sciences, Educational Development Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4781-3108
Negin NaserzadehResearch Center for Social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Vahid RahmanianDepartment of Public Health, Torbat Jam Faculty of Medical Sciences, Torbat Jam, Iran. vahid.rahmani1392@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3460-7495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rising prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical global health challenge. Healthcare workers (HCWs) play a pivotal role in combating AMR by implementing effective preventive strategies and adhering to good practices. This study aimed to evaluate the global knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of HCWs towards AMR.

methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for English-language articles published up to August 2024. Inclusion criteria were observational studies reporting KAP data among HCWs related to AMR. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Statistical analyses, including heterogeneity (I² statistic, Cochran Q), were conducted using STATA version 14. Random-effects models were applied for pooled estimates, and subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Publication bias was assessed via Egger's test and adjusted using the trim-and-fill method. Geographical distribution was analyzed with ArcGIS 10.3 software, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE framework.

resultsA meta-analysis of 108 studies involving 29,433 HCWs assessed their knowledge of AMR. Additionally, 51 studies with 13,660 HCWs evaluated attitudes, and 43 studies with 10,569 HCWs examined practices regarding AMR. The pooled proportion of HCWs with good knowledge of AMR was 56.5% (95% CI: 50.4-62.6%, I² = 99.5%), with the highest prevalence in Europe (70.3%) and the lowest in the Western Pacific (45.9%). Positive attitudes towards AMR were reported in 60.4% (95% CI: 48.5-72.3%, I² = 99.8%), with the highest prevalence in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (64.5%) and among those with less than five years of experience (77.8%). Good practices were observed in 48.5% (95% CI: 36.5-60.5%, I² = 99.7%), with the highest adherence in Europe (56.6%) and the lowest in Africa (39.1%). Subgroup analysis revealed that younger HCWs (under 30 years) showed better KAP scores across all domains.

conclusionThe findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of HCWs regarding AMR. Priority should be given to designing and implementing robust training programs tailored to the specific needs of HCWs in resource-constrained settings. Strengthening AMR-related education and practice among HCWs is crucial for combating the global AMR crisis effectively.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDrug Resistance, BacterialHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelAnti-Bacterial AgentsGlobal HealthHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceAntimicrobial stewardshipGlobal healthHealth personnel

Identifiers

PMID40361230
PMCPMC12076913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.