Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361221›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Indigenous Peoples' responses to evacuation for birth in Ontario: conceptualizing risk through an Indigenous midwifery-led approach.

Erika Campbell, Melanie Murdock, Sarah Durant, Carole Couchie, Carmel Meekis, Charitie Rae, Julie Kenequanash, Lisa Boivin, Jacob Barry, Arthi Erika Jeymohan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Erika CampbellDepartment of Global Health, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada. dr.erikacampbell@gmail.com.
Melanie MurdockDepartment of Gender Studies, Queen's University, Robert Sutherland Hall, Room 419 138 Union Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2P1, Canada.
Sarah DurantSchool of Indigenous and Canadian Studies, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
Carole CouchieZaagidwin Ndaknaan: A Centre of Excellence for Indigenous Midwifery, 322 Sweetgrass Miikan Road, Garden Village, Nipissing, ON, P2B 1B0, Canada.
Carmel MeekisMaternal Child Health Worker, Sandy Lake First Nation, P.O. Box 12, Sandy Lake, ON, P0V 1V0, Canada.
Charitie RaeMaternal Child Health Worker, Sandy Lake First Nation, P.O. Box 12, Sandy Lake, ON, P0V 1V0, Canada.
Julie KenequanashMaternal Child Health Worker, North Caribou Lake First Nation, P.O. Box 158, Weagamow Lake, ON, P0V 2Y0, Canada.
Lisa BoivinToronto Rehabilitation Institute, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.
Jacob BarryDepartment of Gender, Sexuality and Women's Studies, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
Arthi Erika JeymohanDepartment of Cultural Studies, Queen's University, B176 Mackintosh-Corry Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Karen LawfordMidwifery Education Program, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 463557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, pregnant Indigenous Peoples living in remote, rural, and northern Indigenous communities in Canada are subjected to evacuation birth policy, whereby they are evacuated out of their community to large, urban hospitals to give birth. Evacuation for birth is assumed to decrease biomedical risk because people are birthing in hospitals. In Canadian health systems, evaluating and mitigating biomedical risk has become a standard in health decision-making but this framework disregards Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies that guide Indigenous people in their evaluation of health risk. In this study, we sought to understand how pregnant Indigenous people in Ontario conceptualise health and risk.

methodsWe collected data through semi-structured interviews with 43 participants who have been evacuated for birth or are kin of an evacuee who live in Ontario, Canada.

resultsRisks associated with evacuation for birth were conceptualised by participants in a wholistic manner based on principles of self-determination. Participants identified multiple risks that shaped their overall assessment of health risk when facing evacuation for birth including the risk of being separated from kin, confronting a lack of health services, and experiencing discrimination. As participants spoke about risk, they reimagined perinatal care to mitigate these risks, which requires bringing birth back to Indigenous communities through Indigenous midwifery.

conclusionsWe outline actions to limit the practice of evacuation for birth, support the return of birth to Indigenous communities, and expand understandings of risk within policy and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousIndigenous PeoplesMidwiferyAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicOntarioParturitionPregnancyQualitative ResearchBringing Birth HomeCanadaEvacuation for BirthIndigenous HealthIndigenous MidwiferyOntarioSelf-determination of RiskWholistic Risk

Identifiers

PMID40361221
PMCPMC12070555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.