ArticleTrials2025
A complex behaviour change intervention delivered by dental nurses: mixed-methods fidelity assessment of the RETURN intervention.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBehaviour change interventions delivered in dental settings could be useful in reducing oral health inequalities. Pragmatic randomised controlled trials testing interventions, however, are vulnerable to problems with internal and external validity. Intervention fidelity strategies are helpful to address methodological problems and to provide scientific assurances about trial results. This paper sets out the intervention fidelity assessment of the RETURN intervention which was delivered in dental settings to promote planned dental visits.
methodsThe assessment was guided by the National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium intervention fidelity framework domains of training and delivery. A mixed-methods design was selected, using quantitative data collected during intervention delivery training, together with qualitative observations (n = 58), interviews (n = 13) and audio-recordings of intervention delivery sessions (n = 472). Data were analysed separately using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression for the quantitative data and reflexive thematic analysis for the qualitative data. Data were integrated to provide a comprehensive fidelity assessment.
resultsDental nurses were successfully trained to deliver the RETURN intervention; training was successfully standardised, and skills drift minimised. Training presented challenges, and not all nurses achieved competency sign-off to deliver the intervention independently. Nurse characteristics such as dental nursing experience, wider trial procedures and confidence were all found to impact training success. The RETURN intervention was judged to have been delivered with high levels of fidelity, despite few interventions reaching the pre-determined fidelity threshold. Fidelity levels of between 75% and 85% were achieved across intervention domains. Interventionist, intervention dose and intervention topic (dental visiting barrier) were all found to have a relationship with fidelity levels.
conclusionsDental nurses can be trained to deliver a brief behaviour change intervention alongside their usual clinical roles, and this can be delivered with a high degree of intervention fidelity. The results from this fidelity assessment provide assurances about the scientific validity of the RETURN trial results. Recommendations about the suitability of dental nurse interventionists within future dental trials are discussed.
trial registrationISRCTN 84666712. Registered on 12/04/2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.