ArticleBMC research notes2025
A qualitative study on preparedness requirements for responding to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear incidents in Iran.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategic Dimensions of Risk Management in Dealing with CBRNE Events in Military Hospitals: A Qualitative Analysis with a Policy Approach from the Perspective of Experts.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Critical deficits in CBRNE preparedness: A nationwide assessment of Jordanian healthcare providers' knowledge, skills, and training gaps.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe sudden increase in the number of exposed individuals, diverse injuries, damage to health equipment, and disruptions in health services highlight the need for a structured response to radiological and nuclear incidents. This study aims to identify the requirements for responding to CBRN incidents in Iran. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in CBRN preparedness and response in Iran, highlighting areas for potential improvement and policy development. METHODOLOGY: This qualitative research conducted in 2023 involved semi-structured interviews with 32 specialists selected through purposive sampling until data saturation was reached. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the data.
findingsThe requirements for responding to CBRN incidents were categorized into three main classes with nine subcategories: TRAINING: Effective training content, establishment of specialized training centers, identification of target audiences, educational needs assessment, and continuous education. DRILLS: Implementation of various operational drills and their content. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING: Elements of response plans and evaluation of these plans.
conclusionTimely and appropriate responses from the health system during critical phases after such incidents are crucial for mitigating adverse health effects. This study provides insights into the necessary requirements for enhancing readiness in the health sector as Iran progresses towards adopting modern technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.