Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361125›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025

Biomaterial-based strategies for bone cement: modulating the bone microenvironment and promoting regeneration.

Jiawei Jiang, Juan Wang, Pan Fan, Zhe Zhao, Hongjian Deng, Jian Li, Yi Wang, Yuntao Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiawei Jiang *Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Juan Wang *Central Laboratory, Gaochun Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Nanjing, 211300, Jiangsu, China.
Pan FanDepartment of Spine Center, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Zhe ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xuyi People's Hospital, Xuyi, 211700, Jiangsu, China.
Hongjian DengDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated 2 Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
Jian LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xuyi People's Hospital, Xuyi, 211700, Jiangsu, China. 13915160345@163.com.
Yi WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Jiujiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jiujiang, 332000, Jiangxi, China. 13803551980@139.com.
Yuntao WangMedical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China. wangyttod@126.com.

Funding

Project Supported by Science Foundation of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University KD2024KYJJ213Project Supported by Science Foundation of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University KD2024KYJJ296the Jiujiang City Science and Technology Special Project S2024KXJJ0001the research Talent Cultivation Project of Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University CZXM-GSP-RC50
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporotic bone defect and fracture healing remain significant challenges in clinical practice. While traditional therapeutic approaches provide some regulation of bone homeostasis, they often present limitations and adverse effects. In orthopedic procedures, bone cement serves as a crucial material for stabilizing osteoporotic bone and securing implants. However, with the exception of magnesium phosphate cement, most cement variants lack substantial bone regenerative properties. Recent developments in biomaterial science have opened new avenues for enhancing bone cement functionality through innovative modifications. These advanced materials demonstrate promising capabilities in modulating the bone microenvironment through their distinct physicochemical properties. This review provides a systematic analysis of contemporary biomaterial-based modifications of bone cement, focusing on their influence on the bone healing microenvironment. The discussion begins with an examination of bone microenvironment pathology, followed by an evaluation of various biomaterial modifications and their effects on cement properties. The review then explores regulatory strategies targeting specific microenvironmental elements, including inflammatory response, oxidative stress, osteoblast-osteoclast homeostasis, vascular network formation, and osteocyte-mediated processes. The concluding section addresses current technical challenges and emerging research directions, providing insights for the development of next-generation biomaterials with enhanced functionality and therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone CementsBone RegenerationAnimalsCellular MicroenvironmentHumansBiocompatible MaterialsBone CementsBiomaterials modificationBone cementBone microenvironmentBone regenerationOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID40361125
PMCPMC12070552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.