Observational studyBMC cancer2025
Preoperative plasma cell-free DNA chromosomal instability predicts microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study.
Observational study in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05371873 (A Prospective Study of Early Warning and Predictive Indicators Related to the Individualized Staging and Prognosis in Liver Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Study of Early Warning and Predictive Indicators Related to the Individualized Staging and Prognosis in Liver Cancer Patients
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Assessment of Microvascular Invasion Risk in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Liquid Biopsy: Translational Insights and Clinical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Application Value of Liquid Biopsy in Cancer MRD Detection and the Preliminary Clinical Significance of the TFx Value.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrovascular invasion (MVI) has been recognized as a risk factor for early recurrence after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to estimate the performance of an ultrasensitive chromosomal aneuploidy detector (UCAD) model for preoperative MVI prediction in operable HCC patients based on plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA).
methodsA prospective study included HCC patients who underwent surgery in 2021. Preoperative peripheral plasma samples of eligible patients were collected to extract cfDNA, which was then subject to next generation sequencing. Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data were analyzed for chromosomal instability using different parameters, including Z-score, chromosomal instability score (CIN score), tumor fraction (TFx) and a UCAD model (UCAD = CIN score + TFx + Z-score of all chromosomes). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of these parameters in preoperative MVI prediction.
resultsFinally, a total of 74 patients with HCC who undergone hepatectomy were prospectively enrolled. Chromosomal instability was evaluated by copy number alterations and oncogenes MCL1 (located at 1q), MYC (located at 8q), TERT (located at 5p), EGFR (located at 7p), and VEGFA (located at 6p) were identified in plasma cfDNA. The UCAD model was a superior parameter in predicting preoperative MVI, with an area under curve (AUC) value 0.749 with a sensitivity of 0.938 specificity of 0.466. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size (≥ 5 cm) and UCAD (> 0.199) significantly increased the risk of MVI, which were further demonstrated by multivariate analysis, with odd ratio of 1.338 (95%CI, 1.060-1.689) and 2.028 (95%CI, 1.053-3.908) (P < 0.05).
conclusionsOur cfDNA-based UCAD model has shown a promising performance for preoperative MVI prediction in operable HCC patients.
trial registrationThis study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ on 16 May 2022, retrospectively registered, Registration number: NCT05371873.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.