ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2025
Unmet long-term care needs and their association with health-related quality of life among Chinese oldest-old population.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in informal and formal care utilisation and unmet care needs among older adults in Korea: evidence from repeated national surveys.European journal of ageing · 2026Article
- Unraveling the mechanisms of health management needs among rural elderly in underdeveloped Chinese regions: a machine learning approach to predictive model building and factor analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEntering the age of 80 or 100, individuals' functional decline and the need for assistance in daily activities increase dramatically, resulting in an inevitable increase in unmet long-term care (LTC) needs. Understanding unmet LTC needs in late life and their association with quality of life is essential for effective health planning and resource allocation. We aim to estimate the prevalence of unmet needs for LTC and the association of unmet needs for LTC and Health-related Quality of life (HRQOL), among the Chinese oldest-old population.
methodsData were drawn from the 2017 China Hainan Centenarian Cohort Study. All centenarians and a representative sample of individuals aged between 80 and 99 years old in Hainan province, China were included. Self-perceived unmet LTC needs were reported by the respondents. EQ-5D score was calculated from EQ-5D-3L questionnaire to measure HRQOL in this study. We conducted Tobit regression and the Ordered Probit Model to examine the cross-sectional associations between unmet needs for LTC and HRQOL.
results1,444 respondents (mean age 95.75 years [SD 9.13]) were included. The prevalence of unmet LTC needs was 32.69%, and it was higher in rural residents and people with economic deprivation. The results showed that oldest-old individuals with unmet needs for LTC reported lower QALY scores (β=-0.04, p < 0.01). In addition, Unmet LTC needs were significantly correlated with poorer outcomes in mobility (β = 0.18, p < 0.05), self-care (β = 0.19, p < 0.05), pain or discomfort (β = 0.27, p < 0.01), and anxiety or depression (β = 0.09, p < 0.01).
conclusionsThe prevalence of unmet LTC needs was higher in China than its counterpart in high-income countries, especially among those with socio-economic deprivation. Individuals with unmet LTC needs experience lower quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and higher levels of disabilities across multiple dimensions of health, including mobility, usual activities, self-care, pain/discomfort and depression/anxiety. These findings underscore the importance of addressing unmet LTC needs to improve the overall health outcomes and quality of life for the oldest-old population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.